Johns Hopkins Magazine: Alternate Viewpoint

This letter to the editor was published in Johns Hopkins Magazine‘s spring 2022 issue.

In response to American Humane’s “No Animals Were Harmed” catchphrase, I’d offer another: There are two sides to every story. American Humane touts heartwarming tales about dogs being reunited with their guardians or movie-star tigers gallivanting into the sunset as the core of their work. In reality, however, their Hollywood and farmed animal certification programs are marketing efforts that belie the extent of suffering or illness behind the products they certify.

While the former has been accused of covering up abuse during movie production (including The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, where 27 animals reportedly died), the latter—the American Humane Certified label—can be misleading to conscientious consumers about the farms from which its meat is sourced. The charity has recruited celebrities to win over Americans’ hearts, but the act is up for some: Upon learning of these hidden realities, the legendary Bob Barker removed American Humane from his will and declared, “I think they have failed miserably in their efforts to protect animals in the movie industry, and obviously they have failed miserably in any protection for animals in this food industry.”

American Humane is just one example of the growing trend of humanewashing, which employs images of happy hens, labels like “natural,” and even seemingly independent certifications, all to market harmful products to unsuspecting consumers. It’s become nearly impossible to decipher the deceptive sea of labels and claims we encounter at every turn, from our television set to store shelves. Moviegoers and shoppers alike must tread carefully when it comes to claims like American Humane’s—and, when in doubt, opt out.

Laura Lee Cascada, A&S ’13 (MS)
Front Royal, Virginia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 − seven =